Projects Page 2012-2013

  1. Home
  2. Digital Citizenship
  3. experimental design page
  4. Personal Learning Network
  5. Resources
  6. Step 1 Brainstorming a Question
  7. Step 2 Variables and Hypotheses
  8. Step 3 Design Your Experiment
  9. Step 4 Plan your experiment
  10. Step 5 Do your experiment
  11. Step 6 Background
  12. Step 7 Analyze Your Data
  13. Step 8 What does it mean?
  14. Step 9 Prepare for Presentation
  15. Tutorials



Archives
Projects 2011-2012

Schools
Kennett Middle School
Josiah Bartlett School

Teachers
  1. For Teachers
  2. Project Overview
  3. rubrics

wiki rubric

Edit 0 1 …

Wiki Rubric

This rubric can be used as a general rubric for your work on the science fair wiki. Both content and wiki use can generate a grade. Your teacher will give you specifics as to how this will be graded and when.
Modified very little from http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/ by Andrew Churches.
Score
 Content
 Wiki Use
90-100
  • The page show insight, depth and understanding.
  • The content, links, files, media and images are relevant and connected to the topic.
  • The content is obviously written by the student and the student has shown a good depth of understanding and knowledge.
  • The page clearly address the learning objectives.
  • Information sources are acknowledged and cited in a suitable format (MLA).
  • Includes at least three reputable sources
  • Spelling and grammatical errors are rare.
  • The wiki page has structure and is formatted and enhanced to increase readability.
  • Contains appropriate links, files or images.
  • Image sources are acknowledged and include captions.
  • Images and links are referred to within the text. Headings are added using the heading styles.
  • Wiki features like embedding media, horizontal rules and a table of content are included.
  • Student has a consistent appropriate approach to design and layout.
80-89
  • The page shows the student has read and understood the content.
  • The page is rewritten by the student.
  • The content has relevant links or images and the links or images may be referred to.
  • The page address the learning objectives.
  • Information sources are acknowledged.
  • Includes at least three reputable sources
  • Few spelling and grammatical errors.
  • Text is enhanced.
  • The text has structure and the entry flows.
  • Content is arranged in a logical order.
  • The entry contains appropriate links, files or images.
  • Headings are added using the heading styles.
  • Student has a consistent approach to design.
70-79
  • Simple page which shows some depth or level of understanding.
  • Entries are short and for the most part relevant to the topic.
  • Some sections of content are cut and paste or show superficial rewriting.
  • The page shows some understanding.
  • The page attempts to address the learning objectives.
  • Information sources are mentioned.
  • Includes at least two reputable sources.
  • Some spelling and grammatical errors.
  • Text entered with limited enhancements.
  • Simple text enhancements are used.
  • The wiki pages has limited structure or flow.
  • The page may contain links or images.
  • Student has a mostly consistent approach to design
60-69
  • Simple page which lacks insight, depth or is superficial.
  • Entry is short and frequently irrelevant to the topic.
  • Most sections are of content are cut and paste or show superficial rewriting.
  • Language used is not representative of the students language.
  • Shows little understanding.
  • Contains fewer than two reputable sources.
  • Poor spelling and grammatical errors.
  • Text entered with no enhancements.
  • Lacks structure or flow.